Hello everyone, I haven't seen you for a long time, but it's me again. That's an amazing thing to do when you buy a cell phone.
My first cross-check please see
After the Samsung S7 was released, some camera devices with strong paper parameters or advertising parameters came out one after another. Unfortunately, because Zhang Aunt did not give her face, the mobile phone was not passed all the time, and I was also shy, so there was no way to get all the favorite ones. Camera phones to support their own private scientific research. Can only be carefully selected, hoping to buy really worth buying mobile phones to conduct the showdown. In fact, one plus three I bought on the day of the June 16 listing (indicating that monkeys are not serious), first on a purchase screenshot, there is an order number above, lest it be a gunner.
The camera received a lot of photos that night, but because there were quite a lot of things this time, there was no time to write out this Hengping comment. Now the time has passed a month, and no one has given us an early purchase. This phone's comments and suggestions, this one still feel very sorry.
Well, nonsense is placed at the end of the article. Now it is directly loaded with Zhang. The contestants are one plus three, Samsung S7 EDGE and a lens in water SONY micro-single (photographing ability has declined, but improvise, anyway, the protagonist It is not it. If Aunt Zhang has selected me afterwards, and then it will be updated in full sincerity, or it will be automatically shot, in line with the habits of the average user. Try to use pictures to speak and do a small amount of personal opinions.
The first group, the outdoor tree (cloudy, grave when there is time)
One plus three 01
S7 EDGE 01
SONY 01
When the light is good, and Aunt Zhang's thumbnail is so severe, I don't see any difference. Let's look at the details.
001
It can be seen from the sample image that one plus three oil paintings are very heavy. Samsung has a lot of beautification, and the camera actually produced the texture and layering of the leaves. However, realism does not mean it looks good.
Second group of outdoor plants
One plus three 02
S7 EDGE 02
SONY 02
002
The situation is basically the same as the first group.
Third outdoor sign
One plus three 03
S7 EDGE 03
SONY 03
003
Although one plus three is 1600W pixels and Samsung S7 EDGE is 1200w, it can be seen that the resolving power basically does not open the gap.
The fourth group of outdoor buildings
One plus three 04
S7 EDGE 04
SONY 04
004
The resolution of the camera is definitely better, but there is no difference between the two phones.
Group 5 Outdoor Building 2
One plus three 05
S7 EDGE 05
SONY 05
005
One plus three noise came out. Starting from a little weaker light, we can look at the noise problem of one plus three. The S7 EDGE is very good, and of course the camera is the strongest.
Sixth group outdoor corner
One plus three 06
S7 EDGE 06
SONY 06
006
The wider angle of the S7 EDGE is larger, but it will cause some distortion. Looking at the edge quality of the two mobile phones, I feel it is acceptable. Instead, the camera is a little purple border.
Seventh group indoor still life
One plus three 07
S7 EDGE 07
SONY 07
It must be stated in advance that this rotten table was originally bent, not a matter of deformation, but seeing the insecticide can be seen in the S7 EDGE distortion. One plus three is better.
007
Zooming in, one plus three noises are indeed serious.
Eighth group road bike
One plus three 08
S7 EDGE 08
SONY 08
008
From the indoor experience of photography, personally feel that one plus three is actually quite good, focusing is also very forceful, except for the slightest degree of purity.
Ninth Group Restaurant Backlight
One plus three 09
S7 EDGE 09
SONY 09
009
Just finished praise is not enough, this one plus three noise explosion, do not know why, because the light conditions are still pretty good.
Group 10 "Food"
One plus three 10
S7 EDGE 10
SONY 10
010
One plus three called a special camera for food, it feels okay, at least better than the previous one. How do you feel? But I don’t feel bad about it (I’m not having money to eat at all?)
The eleventh supermarket fruit
One plus three 11
S7 EDGE 11
SONY 11
011
Reasonable, did not see what the difference is good, one plus three of this performance is very good.
The twelfth group supermarket fruit 2
One plus three 12
S7 EDGE 12
SONY 12
012
Unfortunately, one plus three lost the chain again and played very unstable. The gap was clear at a glance. This group of people think that the camera is the best, but the oldest family is not happy. Say Samsung is the best and the best (currently the mobile phone is always in use)...so I think this picture is good or not. It's really subjective. Still speak with photos.
Group 13 supermarket lighting
One plus three 13
S7 EDGE 13
SONY 13
013
This group of gaps is also very obvious, Samsung did not give force under low light.
The fourteenth group of micro-focus blur
One plus three 14
S7 EDGE 14
SONY 14
014
Speaking of blurring, the camera flung away from the phone. However, zooming in to see the details, the Samsung S7 EDGE is definitely not bad, and one plus three can only be said to be unsatisfactory.
The fifteenth group of indoor lighting at night
One plus three 15
S7 EDGE 15
SONY 15
015
Finally came to the night duel, this one plus three outstanding performance, do not fall.
The sixteenth group of night indoor lighting 2
One plus three 16
S7 EDGE 16
SONY 16
016
Saying that the whole night from the camera experience, one plus three is still very good, starting fast, imaging speed is very fast, the effect of rough look is not bad. But zooming in to see the details can reveal the second problem of one plus three photographs: the image is a bit imaginary, and I don’t know what the reason is (have already shot several, but it’s the same situation, but it’s certainly not the relationship between hand shaking. ).
Group 17 Night Indoor Low Light
One plus three 17
S7 EDGE 17
SONY 17
017 plus three are still weak, and there is no way to use the 1600W pixel advantage. On the contrary, S7 EDGE is stable and performs well.
The 18th group of outdoor lights at night
One plus three 18
S7 EDGE 18
SONY 18
018
Everyone usually says that S7 EDGE Night Shot is invincible. In fact, during the use of several months, I still found that it has several short boards. The following began to introduce slowly. In addition to the distortion problem, the first is the problem of distortion in the color of light. Can be compared with the camera, especially the details of the comparison chart, although the overall picture of the S7 EDGE as a whole look good, but the lights are completely over exposed, do not see the color, even if the brightness is reduced, still can not shoot a variety of colors . Of course, this is a comparison with the camera. If it's one plus three, it's still much better.
Nineteenth group night outdoor building
One plus three 19
S7 EDGE 19
SONY 19
019
One-plus-three problems with hair are not solved. There is no solution to the problem of S7 EDGE's light fade. Although there is no problem with killing one plus three seconds.
Twenty set of night posters
One plus three 20
S7 EDGE 20
SONY 20
020
This set of diagrams is very interesting. It reveals the third problem of S7 EDGE: weak colors under weak light. Comparing the detailed drawings, we can see that those fonts actually have a three-dimensional effect, but the sample image of S7 EDGE is completely invisible. Although one plus three is slightly worse, but the effect is still there, and finally saved some face in the night competition.
The twenty-first group of weak light 1
One plus three 21
S7 EDGE 21
SONY 21
021
Group 22 Low Light 2
One plus three 22
S7 EDGE 22
SONY 22
022
I am not on the map of the super low light, after all, it is known as the field of S7, not to mention Liu Zuohu has recognized in the press conference in a plus three: there is no meaning to take pictures under the ultra-low light. So I didn't do much work on the contrast in some of the relatively dark scenes. It can be seen that one plus three is not as good as S7 EDGE, but the effect is acceptable.
to sum up:
After many comparisons from morning to night and from inside to outside, it can be seen that there are still many gaps between the one-plus-three photographing and the S7 EDGE, but the whole picture-taking experience can be regarded as excellent and the price can be counted. There is also the configuration of the table burst on the paper, I think if you compare the camera's camera, one plus three is a mobile phone worth buying. Thank you. The Samsung S7 EDGE camera also has some room for improvement, I hope that the 7 will be a perfect camera phone. Or will the next king be IPHONE 7?
Extra words come again:
In order to increase the number of words in this article and improve the chances of passing, I still briefly explain why we chose one plus three. We can also choose to skip directly. Thank you.
Considering a lot of mobile phones before buying one plus three: LG G5, a really powerful camera phone, although it does not replace the sensor, but it is still more advanced than the G4, is said to be the pinnacle of the current resolution, unfortunately the price is too high, the camera experience is also In general, the overall feeling is not worth; HTC 10 photo hardware hardware parameters are the strongest, the actual performance is worrying, the price is high, there is no telecommunications 4G dual card dual standby, directly eliminated; the same Sony family out (as a half cable powder very distressed). Huawei P9 (Glory V8), advertising parameters can kill SLR, the actual results in general, anti-shake basically rely on feelings, eliminated; Vivo xplay5, OPPO R9, Hong Kong really, I actually have a good impression on the blue and green manufacturers have a good impression (cousin There is a R7, the actual effect is good), however, these two machines are not optical image stabilization, let me down, another reason is too expensive (too poor), Khan, eliminated; LeTV MAX2, Lenovo ZUK Z2 pro, two monkeys Machine, the paper parameters are also very strong, when the monkey can not buy; millet 5 ... ... is actually okay, but as a millennial user, if not desperation, I really do not want to use millet's ADUI, very disgusted . Just when I had no choice but to choose one of Xiaomi 5 and Glory V8, one plus three debuted. The paper parameters were also strong enough to explode, and the one-two plus camera level was also among the front lines in domestic mobile phones. So I Believe in Liu Zuohu's sentence: One plus three photos can pk all the flagship machines on the market. Decided to buy it back.